Each year at the church we have a vision verse. It is an opportunity to focus our minds on one specific aspect of living as a Christian and we tend to explore it through a number of sermons across the year. Last year our focus was 1 Corinthians 10:31- “Whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.”
Regulars at Woody Road will know that I repeated an illustration (I don’t have that many…) several times. In the 16th century, Nicolaus Copernicus argued that the sun was at the centre of the known universe rather than the earth. In many ways it was a complete change to the way people thought about the universe- something else was central. Essentially, 1 Cor 10:31 calls for a Copernican Revolution in the way we think about everything. I am not central. My desires, ambitions and longings are not the main reality. God- and His glory- are at the centre of the universe. I am only living in line with reality when I grasp that for God alone is the ultimately great One.
In some ways such thinking can be a bit of a shock to us- even as Christians. It is very easy for us to drift into a way of thinking where we pursue our ambitions and dreams and see God’s role as giving them to us. We dream of success, romantic love and a comfortable life- and we expect God to provide. The problem with this is that I am at the centre: it is not reality.
To remove ourselves from the centre in our thinking can feel daunting. And yet it really is the best way to live. I remember a friend of mine, who is an atheist, telling me that some of the most awesome moments of his life came as he simply looked at the night sky. There is something within us that makes us enjoy gazing on that which is great and magnificent. But if a night sky is awesome, how much more the One who made it? And what of the One whose love is so great that He would enter the agony of human existence and die for human rebels? We are made to enjoy and live for and glorify that God- it is where we find our ultimate pleasure and it is where we live in line with what is Real. The centrality of self constantly yanks us back yet the call is to recognise and live out the truth: God is at the centre of the universe and I am at my best when I acknowledge that.
Why mention all of this? Because it was this picture that came to my mind recently when I was asked about homosexual relationships. How can it be right to say that some people can get married and others can’t? How can that be fair? To be honest, if you start from a pre-Copernican position (in the illustration) with human beings at the centre, it is a pretty difficult question to answer. After all, if we are central then how can anybody argue against us carrying out our deeply felt desires and wishes if it seemingly won’t harm anybody? That’s the reason why the arguments against gay marriage held little traction in the recent debates- we live in a culture that is adamant that humanity is central and, by extension, that my desires are all important. The discussions lacked much sense of common ground- for we have a fundamental disagreement about the shape of the universe.
For minds to change, a Copernican Revolution needs to take place. Consider for a moment that God is central to the universe. That God has a plan. It is to bring people to an eternity of ecstatic joy as they enter into the most deeply satisfying relationship of all- with Jesus Christ. This plan is no mere speculation- it has been revealed in human history as Jesus walked on the earth and had his sayings and doings recorded by eyewitnesses. Now consider for a moment that God decided to put a big pointer to His plan deep within society. It is called marriage- for the ultimate plan of God is to bring people into a marriage relationship with His Son where He is enjoyed and glorified forever.
When this Copernican Revolution takes place, suddenly our thinking about sexuality and marriage changes. It is no longer primarily about an answer to my desires. It is now about fitting into God’s plan to have a picture pointing out the path to human joy forever. Isn’t that how Paul’s mind works in Ephesians 5?
So how does that impact somebody like me who experiences homosexual attraction? It means that I need to live with the centrality of God in all things. That’s not always easy- I often want to put myself central which will mean a longing to express my sexual desires or, perhaps, drift into self-pity. But when the Revolution takes place in my mind, I begin to see that history is heading to the final marriage where ultimate satisfaction alone can be found. And whilst some might appropriately prepare for that through heterosexual marriage, others will prepare through celibacy and with eyes fixed on Christ. All of this until the day when we rejoice and be glad for the wedding of the Lamb has come and his bride has made herself ready. Personally, I am infinitely more joyful when I have this perspective. For when we think like this we are at our best and we are living in line with the true shape of the universe.
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your honesty in these posts.
One of the arguements against same sex marriage that I don’t understand is the one you make here, I wonder if you can explain a bit more.
If you claim that God wants us all to be drawn into a marriage relationship with Christ (and I say amen to that!) isn’t that an arguement for same sex marriage rather than against it? otherwise how am I as a man able to enter into that kind of relationship with Jesus?
Every blessing,
Ric
Hi Ric,
Thanks so much for engaging with this: really appreciate it. I realise the question you ask is a hole that I left in my argument here- I covered it in the original talk that I gave on the subject but should have repeated it here.
I think I would make a couple of points. Firstly, if you take the ultimate wedding with Christ as the guide then it is clearly a marriage between two beings that are different- Christ is not the church and vice versa. That’s essentially the line Paul pursues in Ephesians 5 with respect to human marriage: though of equal value, men and women are different and correspond to Christ and the church. Consequently, it isn’t any relationship that points forward to the ultimate wedding but specifically a committed and faithful relationship between a man and a woman. Secondly, I would observe that strictly speaking (and I confess that I don’t always express this as carefully as I should) the ultimate wedding is between the church (with me as a part) and Christ rather than simply me as an individual married to Jesus. So in that sense it is quite different from a homosexual relationship.
I hope that is useful- as I say, thanks for engaging with it.
Warmest greetings,
Andy
Excellent post and thanks for your encouragement to to live our lives for one other than ourselves
Thank you for these really honest and thoughtful posts, Andy.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply Andy.
So the heart of this id a relationship between two people that are different. My partner is different to me in almost every way apart from the fact that he is the same gender. So why privilege gender as the one thing that definitely has to be different? Also – how do you define male and female? It’s evident from the experience of transgender and intersex people that gender is far from the simple male/female dichotomy.
Gender is a rich and vibrant spectrum as is sexuality. To admit this leads to a much richer model for the relationship between Christ and his bride – the church is a rich mixture of genders and sexualities – so the marriage of Christ to the Church is the queerest marriage of them all. So I find myself in a position where my faith in Christ leads me to celebrate the richness and diversity of human genders and relationships because they are a sign of the vibrant and infinite ways God relates to us and calls us to encounter him.
Every blessing
Ric
Hi Ric,
Thanks for the message. I am aware this is a big issue for both of us.
I entirely agree that people are different and that gender (however defined) isn’t the only point of difference. However, it seems to me that we are not at liberty to decide for ourselves what the best image of Christ and the church is. That would be to put my opinions and emotions centre stage. From creation, God has revealed His plan- it is male and female who come together in marriage. This is affirmed by Jesus Himself when he quotes Gen 2:24 in answer to a question about divorce in Matthew 19. We are Christians because we are convinced by the evidence that Jesus of Nazareth is Lord. As such, I’m not convinced that I have the freedom to define what marriage looks like in a manner different to Him. It seems to me that only if we accept that can we really claim that He is central. Of course, there is pain and challenge in accepting that for it feels like we are squashing our own deeply felt desires. However, I am also convinced it is the path to true life.
I’m not entirely sure we are going to convince each other- but, again, thanks for engaging!
Andy
Thanks Andy,
No, I don’t think we will persuade each other – for a start we both have so much invested in our own positions and have much to lose if we changed our understanding!
Thanks for your honest answers, I appreciate the conversation, and if you’re ever in Sheffield do drop by for a cuppa.
Every blessing to you and for your ministry
Ric
Hi Andy,
Thanks again for another helpful post, not just on the issue of homosexuality but touching on so much more. Thanks for sharing publicly and helping others voice their questions.
God bless,
Stephen